Archives

A painter of landscapes, portraits, and genre, Thaddeus Welch is best known for his views of Marin County, California.

 

Born in La Porte, IN on July 14, 1844. Welch crossed the plains with his family in a prairie schooner at age thirteen and settled on a farm near Portland, OR.

 

After graduating from nearby McMinnville College, he accepted a position in Portland at Walling’s Printing Office. Coming to California in 1866, he lived for a brief period with his aunt in Dixon before moving to San Francisco. While employed as a typesetter with the Call and Bulletin, Welch studied art with Virgil Williams and was an apprentice in the studio of J. W. Ogilvy in exchange for art lessons. While there, he made the acquaintance of a wealthy patroness who financed a four-year scholarship for further study in Europe.

 

In 1874 he sailed for Munich where he entered the Royal Academy under Dietz, Piloty, and Leibl. While in Munich he became close friends with Frank Duveneck (who painted his portrait), Wm M. Chase, and John Twachtman. Leaving Germany, he spent nearly four years in Paris where he continued studying while living on a houseboat on the Seine.

 

Welch returned to the U.S. in 1881 and painted for a while in the Hudson River area where he met Ludmilla Pilat whom he married in 1883. He worked for lithographer Louis Prang in Boston, and followed portrait and cyclorama commissions to Philadelphia, Chicago and Australia. Upon returning from Australia in 1889, he was active in San Francisco for a while before returning to New York for Ludmilla. After spending several months at the World’s Fair in Chicago in 1893, the couple returned to California. After one year in Pasadena, they moved north to the San Francisco Bay area. Poverty stricken but deeply in love, they camped out in the hills of Marin County until a suitable cottage could be found in nearby San Geronimo Valley. There the Welches began painting the poetic scenes of rural Marin that were to bring success and freedom from financial worry. Due to Thad’s health they were forced to seek a milder climate and in 1905 moved to Santa Barbara where he remained until his death on Dec. 19, 1919.

 

Member: Bohemian Club; SFAA. Exh: Munich Academy, 1876 (bronze medal); Paris Salon, 1880, Calif. State Fair, 1895, 1902.

 

In: Oakland Museum; CHS; San Diego Museum; Frye Museum (Seattle).

 

Source:
Edan Hughes, "Artists in California, 1786-1940"
Thad Welch, Pioneer and Painter; History & Ideals of American Art (Neuhaus); Artists of the American West (Samuels); Artists of the American West (Doris Dawdy); American Western Art (Harmsen); California Art Research, 20 volumes; California Historical Society; Southern California Artists (Nancy Moure); SF Chronicle, 12-28-1919 (obituary).

Born in Rockport, Massachusetts, Stevens spent four years at Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts School, where he studied under Edmund Tarbell, among others. Primarily an oil painter, he also used watercolor and acrylics. Throughout the course of his long career, Stevens taught, first in Rockport, then at Boston University (1925-1926) and Princeton (1927-1929). He later gave lessons and held one-man shows in Charlotte and Asheville, North Carolina, where his work was well-received. Southerners particularly enjoyed his views of famous Southern cities and gardens. 

For more information on this artist or the Southern masterworks in our collection, please visit our gallery website.

This essay is copyrighted by the Charleston Renaissance Gallery and may not be reproduced or transmitted without written permission from the Hicklin Galleries, LLC.

One of a group of landscape painters who emerged from Chicago at the turn of the century, Lawrence Mazzanovich was born to immigrant parents at sea off the coast of California. The family eventually settled in Chicago, where Mazzanovich attended classes at the Art Institute. Following his marriage in 1902, he moved to Paris for further study. He visited the major museums, spent time at the art colonies in Fountainbleau, Moret-sur-Loing and Giverny, and painted tonalist views of the French and Italian countryside. Returning to the U.S. in 1909, Mazzanovich moved to Westport, Connecticut, where a small art colony had formed. Abandoning the tonalist concerns of his earlier years, he developed the decorative style for which he is best known today, an aesthetic that combined elements of tonalism with a brightly colored impressionism. In 1923 Mazzanovich sought fresh inspiration in Tryon, North Carolina, where he remained for the rest of his life. Though he painted fewer pictures thereafter, the quality of his later work remained consistently high.

For more information on this artist or the Southern masterworks in our collection, please visit our gallery website.

This essay is copyrighted by the Charleston Renaissance Gallery and may not be reproduced or transmitted without written permission from the Hicklin Galleries, LLC.

Frankness and sincerity are the hallmark of Mrs. Ronner and it is these qualities combined with a true artist’s temperament that made her renowned, and whose popularity will not likely fade any time soon. 

 

That is what E. Baes wrote in the Journal of Fine Arts and Literature in 1887 (“Expositions De Tableaux.” Journal des Beaux-arts et de la Literature, no. xxix, 1887, p. 187) 

 

During her life, Henriëtte Ronner-Knip became widely recognized for her paintings of dogs and cats, which she specialized in at a later stage of her artistic career.  Her mastery at depicting the feline race was described by Marion H. Spielman, who was asked to write an English essay about the artist for the Magazine of Art in 1890, and which he published in a book a year later.  He wrote that:

 

She has produced a cat-world as impressive as the cattle-world of Potter (Paulus Potter-Dutch, 1625-1654), and as beautiful and touching as the stag and dog worlds of Landseer (Sir Edwin Henry Landseer-British, 1802-1873); and she has peopled it with a race remarkable above all for beauty and grace, for playfulness and cunning, and for intelligence afar beyond what most people have any knowledge of. (Henriette Ronner: The Painter of Cat Life and Cat Character, London: Cassell, 1891, pp. 1, 2) 

 

She was born Henriëtte Knip on May 31, 1821 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands into a family of artists.  Her father, Josephus Augustus Knip (1777-1847) began working as a wallpaper painter in his father’s studio, and went to Paris, France, in 1801, where he produced mostly landscapes in gouache.  After winning the Prize of Rome (1808) he spent a few years in Italy from 1809.  There, he made numerous drawings of Roman monuments and landscapes in the Neo-classical style.  In 1813, he went back to the Netherlands, before moving again in 1823 to Paris with his wife and two children, Augustus and Henriëtte.  When Josephus returned four years later to the Netherlands, his eyesight began to fail, and he became totally blind in 1832.   Even then, he moved within the Netherlands, first to The Hague then to Brabant, where he died in 1847.  

 

Since the early age of five, Henriëtte showed a talent and disposition for drawing, and copied many studies and sketches from her father.  Most of her early childhood drawings that are known were created during her stay in France with her family (as noted by Harry J. Kraaij, Dictionary of Women Artists, London, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 1997, vol.2, p. 1195).  After settling in the Netherlands, she began her artistic education under her father’s guidance at age eleven.  When he lost his eyesight, Josephus decided to train his daughter seriously, as she would become responsible for providing income for the family.  From that time, young Henriëtte underwent a rigorous training regimen in her father’s studio, where she would remain at her easel from sunrise to sunset, except for small breaks for meals and a short siesta at midday.  Josephus was her only teacher; he urged her to study from nature, and warned her “against seeing with eyes other than her own.” (Spielman, p. 25) He also told her what to look for and how to look for it, and constantly reminded her of the sacrifices that an artist must make in order to reap the joy of success.  Despite the severity of her training, Henriëtte realized that her father’s training system and advice would “more likely bring her to the highest excellence by developing her own powers and resources, than the cold system ordinarily adopted in our academies.” (as quoted by Spielman, p. 25) 

 

Henriëtte learnt quickly, and began to create art works fast in order to sell them.  By the time she was sixteen years old, she first exhibited her work at the annual art exhibition in Düsseldorf.  Her picture of a cat at a window was sold, and henceforth, Henriëtte became a regular contributor to the exhibitions of Germany and Holland.  She was a rapid producer, so by age eighteen, she was able to paint and sell a large number of popular subjects that included pastoral landscapes, castles, farms, genres scenes, still lifes and portraits.  Despite that diverse production, she gradually began to focus more on animal scenes, which was her favorite subject.  Instead of landscapes, she depicted more images of cows, sheep, horses, and birds.  Henriëtte’s style at that time was characterized her precision and attention to detail, and use of dark colors, all which reflected the influence of the classicistic landscapes of her father (Kraaij, p. 1195)

 

Around 1845 Henriëtte dedicated her works to animal scenes that depicted dogs, typically hunting dogs in forests and heath countryside.  She began to receive critical praise at that time because of her “accomplished painting technique, balanced compositions and large formats.” (Kraaij, p. 1196) In the meantime, she met Teico Ronner whom she married in 1850, and since adopted the name of Henriëtte Ronner-Knip.  That same year, they moved from Brabant to Brussels, Belgium, where she was to give birth to six children (two of them would become painters: Alfred Ronner 1852-1901, and Alice Ronner, 1857-1906), and to spend the rest of her life.  Her first years of marriage were a struggle, as her husband was sickly, and she was once again responsible to provide the family income.  Used to hard work, Henriëtte woke up regularly at five in the morning, and painted diligently to earn her family’s livelihood.

 

Shortly after moving to Brussels, Henriëtte concentrated on painting images with dogcarts, which was a common means of transportation by the less well-to-do farmers and peddlers during the nineteenth century. These works evoked a Romantic influence, which is best reflected in one of her more popular works, Death of a Friend (1860, Museum of Fine Arts, Brussels).  This painting, which measures eight feet by six feet, depicts an old sandseller weeping over the death of one of his dogs, still harnessed to the cart.  This painting was highly acclaimed and as noted by E. Baes in 1887 “continued to be one of her most beautiful creations because maybe it reflects an era that is not so far away, yet absolutely different than the one we are obliged to live in.” (Baes, p. 187) After exhibiting this painting in Brussels in 1860, Henriëtte established her reputation as a dog painter, and subsequently received an increasing number of commissions from many distinguished patrons.  Among them were the Kings of Hanover, Prussia, Portugal, and the Queen of Belgium as well as the Countess of Flanders who asked her to paint portraits of their dogs.   

 

Despite her growing popularity, she continued to live modestly and eventually changed the subject matter of her paintings, which had initially contributed to her fame.  Around 1870, she shifted her attention from painting dogs to cats.  That change occurred when a cat found her way into her home, and Henriëtte’s curiosity was aroused.  As cats became her new models, she began to observe and study their attitudes, movements, and expressions, which she remarkably captured in her canvases.  Spielman remarked that she is “one of the very few eminent animal painters of the day, and as a specialist one of the most admirable of all times,” and he praised her painting technique comparing it to Rosa Bonheur’s (1822-1899), saying that it is “virile, vigorous, decisive, unfailing in its truth, and admirable in its result.” (Spielman, pp. 34, 36)

 

Because cats were increasingly kept as house-pets, this subject became particularly popular among the art-buying urban middle class.  Thus, Henriëtte continued to produce a variety of scenes of sleepy cats and playful kittens in her usual dark colors. . (Kraaij, p. 1196)  In the 1880s and 1890s, her works came to include some of the popular motifs influenced by Japanese and Chinese art.  As she increased her production of art works, Henriëtte also began making a water color or oil sketch for each painting in order to avoid repetition and detect forgeries. However, as modernism gained more prominence, her work began to be described as “uninspiring and conservative,” and these unfavorable remarks may have possibly led her to use a lighter palette, and move away from her carefully arranged compositions. (as noted by Kraaij, p. 1196) She died on March 2, 1909 in Brussels.

 

During her illustrious career, Henriëtte Ronner-Knip exhibited widely and received numerous prestigious awards and honors.  In 1850, she was elected as a Member of Merit of the Society “Artis Magistra” of Amsterdam.  In 1857 she received the Silver Medal from The Hague, followed a year later by a Bronze Medal from Dijon, and in 1860 the Vermeil (silver-gilt) Medal at Troyes.  In 1861, Henriëtte was awarded three medals, the Silver Medal at Metz, the Gold Medal at The Hague, and the Great Gold Medal at Lyons.  Before the end of the following year, she was elected as a Member of Merit of the “Academy of Painting and Drawing of Rotterdam.  Then, in 1864, she received the Bronze Medal from Nancy, and the Silver Medal from Rouen.  These were followed by the Gold Medal and Certificate of Honor at the Universal Exhibition of Oporto in 1865.  Three years later, she received the Silver Medal from Havre and the Gold Medal from Amsterdam.  In 1873, she was awarded the “Artistic Medal” at the Universal Exhibition of Vienna, and was presented with the “Unique Medal of Merit” by the King of Holland a year later.  Other awards included the “Artistic Medal” at the Exhibition of Philadelphia in 1876, two Gold Medals from Antwerp and Amsterdam in 1879 and 1880 respectively.  Amsterdam again awarded her the Gold Medal in 1883, and that year Edinburgh presented her with the Silver Medal.   In 1887, she was awarded the Cross of the Order of Leopold II King of Belgium (Chevalier d’Lordre de Léopold), a rare honor for a woman to receive, and in 1909 she became Knight of the Order of Orange-Nassau, Netherlands.

 

The works of Henriëtte Ronner-Knipp can be seen at several museums including the Gemeentemuseum, The Hague; the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam; the Dordrechts Museum, Dordecht; and the Museum of Fine Arts, Brussels. 

As a member of the Abstract Expressionist movement, Hartigan received major accolades from her participation in the 1950 New Talent exhibition curated by Meyer Schapiro and Clement Greenberg, solo exhibitions at Tibor de Nagy, and her inclusion, as the only female artist, in the 1956 Twelve Americans exhibition at MoMA.
 
Hartigan’s work represents the voice of a true female Abstract Expressionist torn between abstraction and figuration, high art and pop culture, and images and words. From her first solo exhibition in 1951 at the highly revered Tibor de Nagy gallery to the present, Hartigan continues to form her own unique artistic language based upon the dedication and aesthetic of great friends and icons Willem de Kooning and Jackson Pollock as well as her appreciation of the Old Masters’ clear and concise artistic approaches to still life and portraiture.  
 
Hartigan’s work has always exuded a sense of playfulness in its finality and her themes and styles continue to evolve. While her abstractions attest to her brilliant understanding of the formal aesthetics of good painting, her figurations and portraits reveal a more intimate challenge for the artist; the question of identity. Throughout each evolving style, Hartigan explores the varying relationship between traditions and rituals among different cultures and genders.
 
Within this context Hartigan’s portraits reveal an insight to the traditions and rituals of different cultures and genders.   In an attempt to work through the problems associated with identity, both Hartigan’s early portraits(Grand Street Brides Series) and late portraits, (seen here, Portia and Tunisian Woman) draw on a variety of sources for inspiration, namely modern traditions and conveniences, paper dolls, imaginary heroes, famous paintings from art history, and great queens and empresses. Each portrait seems to ‘transcend individual experience to express the isolation that exists beneath the customary rituals of modern life’. [Mattison, 1990]
 
In addition to pure abstractions, word imagery, collages, and portraits, Hartigan also pursued a much different approach to her work, particularly in the 1970’s. In these canvas’ Hartigan deals with a more intimate issue than that of identity; life and death, sin and salvation become dominating themes and allow a purging of personal inner turmoil on the canvas’. Both Clarissa’s World and Land and Sea are excellent examples of Hartigan’s achievements during this decade, ones characterized by image fragmentation, obsessively crowded spatial arrangements, and perhaps her most brilliant uses of color.
 
Hartigan’s work is represented in landmark institutions such as the Guggenheim, MoMA, the Metropolitan, the Whitney, the Corcoran, and the Smithsonian.

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

Fourth Dimension

August 6-August 25, 2009

 

“If you can imagine a point moving, it becomes a line.  A line becomes a surface and a surface becomes a cube.  If you move the cube, this is infinite already because you are suggesting freedom.”

-Maurice Golubov on the “fourth dimension”

 

The term “fourth dimension”, although technically defined using mathematical computation, generally refers to the infinite relationship between time and space, a primary artistic concern during the early 20th century.  Rejecting the traditions of one-point perspective, artists began incorporating elements of multiple perspectives in their work, essentially departing from their own three-dimensional reality and creating a world of endless possibilities.  Cubism, for example, shattered the picture plane, simultaneously portraying all sides of perspective anchored on a singular plane, “painting not as they saw it, but as they thought it”.

 

Many artists of the early 20th century began using the fourth dimension as the foundation with which to explore the metaphysical content of geometric symbolism.  They sought to create works which allowed the viewer to simultaneously exist in both the third and fourth dimension, without the use of traditional perspective or the familiarity of subjective iconography. While the fourth dimension in all spectrums of visual art stands as an extension of the infinite, there are many different means of representation, such as time, space, or spirituality.

 

This exhibition will highlight the successes of mid-20th century artists who worked to represent the ideologies of the fourth dimension within their work, namely Nassos Daphnis, Maurice Golubov, Budd Hopkins, De Hirsch Margules, Irene Rice Pereira, Rolph Scarlett and Charmion von Wiegand. Please visit our website for more information on these artists and others in our inventory. 

 

NASSOS DAPHNIS (1914- )

 

While being represented by Leo Castelli Gallery from 1958-1990, Nassos Daphnis worked and exhibited alongside some of the most influential artists of the Post-War era, including Andy Warhol, Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg, and Ellsworth Kelly.  Additionally his work is included in the permanent collections of major institutions including the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum (NY), the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, the Butler Institute of American Art and the Whitney Museum of American Art.

 

Daphnis created his first geometric abstraction in Paris in 1952, a style which became the future visualization of his artistic identity.  His color theory is dependent upon each color being assigned a density and spiritual value, lending to his work a calculated but visual simplistic co-existence of visual tension and metaphysical implications.  

 

MAURICE GOLUBOV (1905-1987)

 

Overlooked as one of the early pioneers of the American abstract movement, Maurice Golubov created an early artistic vocabulary, which paralleled that of Mondrian and the Russian Constructivists, within the confines of his own will and without pre-exposure to any artistic influence.   Golubov’s work was exhibited extensively at the Museum of Modern Art (NY) and the Whitney Museum of American Art in the 1950s and 1960s.  Additionally by 1975, Tibor de Nagy invited him into their stable of modern artists and in 1980 a retrospective of Golubov’s work was held at the Mint Museum in South Carolina.

 

With an early pre-occupation towards Jewish mysticism and other Eastern philosophies pertaining to the transcendental, Golubov spent his entire artistic career developing a philosophy which reconciled these ideas. Similar to Cézanne, Kandinsky and Mondrian, Golubov felt that art was a spiritual undertaking. Therefore, while formally the “fourth dimension” for Golubov represented a certain freedom of the fixed planar elements from the canvas’ space, it also suggested a realm beyond the physical, that of infinite possibility. 

 

BUDD HOPKINS (1931- )

 

A candid reflection on the artistic career of Budd Hopkins reveals a style imbued with the emotional dynamism of the 1950s, the cool sensibility of the 1960s, and the linear geometry of the 1970s. Works from all points of his illustrious career are in the collection of thirty-two museums including the Guggenheim Museum (NY), The Corcoran Gallery of Art, the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Whitney Museum of American Art.

 

Using Léger’s hard-edged style as an influence, Hopkins embraced the harmonious union of angles and circles, blacks and whites versus colors, and flatness with depth.  However, while these works from the 1960s reveal a static moment in time, his later paintings reach towards a multi-dimensional atmosphere, exemplifying Hopkins’ ability to transcend movement on a two-dimensional plane, revealing a struggle for “time and attention” within the space. 

DE HIRSCH MARGULES (1899-1965)

 

De Hirsch Margules became an intrinsic part of the art world in New York City as early as 1929.  His endearing friendship with Alfred Stieglitz, artist and major patron/dealer, allowed him the opportunity to meet and learn from some of the most renowned artists of the period; Stuart Davis, Jan Matulka, and John Marin (who became Margules’ mentor).  Within his lifetime career Margules has had over 30 one-man shows, consistent representation at the Whitney Annuals from 1938-1956, and his work is currently in the permanent collections of major museums such as the Whitney Museum of American Art, the Museum of Modern Art, NY, and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. 

 

Margules sought to create a technique which would serve as a new artistic language for the third dimension of physical presence and the fourth dimension of time.  His works have a transcendental quality about them, one which is inherent in perspective and in medium.  The canvas’ which were divided into quadrants observed “the phenomenon of visual time…..the waxing and waning of light, changing all it envelops” ( King, 1963). Other works effectively show his build-up of medium, ultimately expressing the tangibility of the object represented. The impact of the brilliantly vivid color combinations is meant to recreate the psychological impact of the time of day upon the viewer. 

 

IRENE RICE PEREIRA (1902-1971)

 

Considered a major Bauhaus proponent in the United States, Irene Rice Pereira’s oeuvre reflects her commitment to machine-age materials and a philosophy that called for a merging of technology and the transcendental. Her body of work is expressive of the same industrial aesthetic extant in works by Charles Sheeler, Charles Demuth, and Fernand Léger.  Retrospectives on Pereira were given at the Museum of Modern Art in 1946 and the Whitney Museum of American Art in 1953 and her work is included in the permanent collections of a number of museums including the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, Guggenheim Museum (NY) and Whitney Museum of American Art.

 

The geometric visual language Pereira created heavily recalls various proponents of Jungian philosophy and ancient Chinese texts; while Jungian philosophy stressed the integration of spirituality and symbolism, the Chinese texts emphasized the importance of light and its source. 

 

 

ROLPH SCARLETT (1891-1984)

 

Rolph Scarlett was the first American artist selected to exhibit alongside Wassily Kandinsky, Paul Klee, and Rudolph Bauer for Solomon R. Guggenheim’s Museum of Non-Objective Painting in 1940.  Scarlett’s acceptance into the Museum as a primary exhibitor and chief lecturer resulted in a close friendship with its founder, Hilla Rebay, who was the driving force for the Non-Objective style being created for the Museum. His works are represented in the permanent collections of numerous museums including the Guggenheim, the Whitney Museum of American Art, the Museum of Modern Art and the Smithsonian.

 

Throughout his life Scarlett wavered between a style that was representational, Non-Objective, and abstract, the latter representing his true voice and passion.  According to scholar and author, Harriet Tannin, Scarlett created a substantial body of pure abstractions, beginning in the 1930’s and would continue to do them in secret during his tenure of creating non-objective works for Rebay’s Guggenheim.  However, the two Scarlett oils chosen for exhibition at the Whitney Museum’s 1951 Annual were his abstract expressionist works.

 

 

CHARMION VON WIEGAND (1896-1983)

 

As an active member and President (1950-1953) of the American Abstract Artists and a leading artist in the abstract Neo-Plastic field, Charmion von Wiegand is most notably recognized for her use of flat planes, her preoccupation with simple, elementary colors and her fragmented rectilinear constructions. Her work resides in the permanent collections of the Albright-Knox Art Gallery, the Neuberger Museum of Art, the Whitney Museum of American Art and several other institutional and private collections.

 

She was heavily influenced by her friend Piet Mondrian and worked closely with him to develop his artistic theories. Until his death in 1944, the two collaborated on essays relating to Mondrian’s principles of abstract Neo-Plastic art, which von Wiegand eventually chronicled in her book about Mondrian and his aesthetic. 

 

The De Stijl movement of which both Mondrian and Von Wiegand were associated, interpreted the fourth dimension as negative space, primary colors represented positive space while black represented negative space.  Both Mondrian and von Wiegand sought to express space using a conceptual rather than physical reality as their basis. 

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4


/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

Bertoia has been credited for bringing sound to sculpture.  Around 1960 he began creating “sonambient” works that create pleasing tonal music when played.  Harry often gave concerts with them and other musicians incorporated the tonal sounds into their compositions. 

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }


/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

A sculptor of kinetic objects, many of them with mazes of thin rods that appear brush like, Harry Bertoia was born in San Lorenzo, Italy, and came to America in 1930. In 1936, he studied at the Detroit Society of Arts and Crafts and then attended Cranbrook Academy of Art in Bloomfield, Michigan, where he later taught and established the metalworking department. During this time, he began experimenting with jewelry forms and explored ideas that would later emerge into his sculpture. 

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }


/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

In 1943, he moved to Venice, California and worked with designer Charles Eames in war efforts until 1946. That first year, he attended a welding class at Santa Monica City College. In 1947, he moved to La Jolla to work in the Point Loma Navel Electronics Laboratory in the publications department creating training manuals for equipment operators. During this time, he continued making jewelry and monoprints and began his first experiments with metal sculpture. 

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }


/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

In 1949, he moved to Barto, Pennsylvania where he joined Hans Knoll in Knoll Associates. He became a prolific architectural sculptor. His first commission was a screen for the General Motors Technical Center in Warren, Michigan. His first sculpture exhibition was in 1951 at the Knoll Showroom in New York.

It was his custom not to sign his works because he believed that the piece itself was a signature, that what he created belonged to the universe, and that a signature called attention to the artist rather than the work of art.

Source:
Jeffrey Head, Phillips de Pury & Luxembourg catalogue of 11/19/2002
Matthew Baigell, "Dictionary of American Art"

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

William Chadwick, often referred to as the “quintessential American Impressionist artist”,  ranks alongside such other major American Impressionist artists as Childe Hassam, Willard Metcalf, and Walter Griffin, all of whom spent summers together at the boarding home of Florence Griswold in Old Lyme, Connecticut.  Chadwick was introduced to the Old Lyme artist colony by fellow artists William Foote and Harry Hoffman from the Arts Students League in New York.  Up to that point in time, Chadwick’s paintings had focused primarily on portraiture and genre scenes popular with artists such as Joseph DeCamp and other members of the classically trained Boston School.  After being exposed to the rolling countryside of Connecticut and to the newly evolving impressionist painting style of his fellow artists in the Old Lyme art community, however, Chadwick began to turn his previous focus towards “plein air” or outdoor painting of landscapes which reflected the different play of lights and shadows on his subjects within his own distinctive style that was marked by subtle tones, broad brushwork and texturally impastoed surfaces.

 

Associations:

Lyme Art Association

Salmagundi Club Member

Collections & Museums:

Florence Griswold Museum, Old Lyme, Connecticut

George Walter Vincent Smith Museum, Springfield, Massachusetts

Lyman Allyn Museum, New London, Connecticut

Pfeil Collection – Impressionists

Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington D.C.

The Marshall Collection

The Mattatuck Museum of the Mattatuck Historical Society, Connecticut

 

Exhibitions:

Art Institute of Chicago

Corcoran Gallery, Washington D.C.

Lyme Art Association

National Academy of Design

Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts

Vose Galleries, Boston

When Isaac Edward Cecil De Hirsh DeTannerier Gilmont Margules died in 1965, The "New York Times" noted his important role in the city’s aesthetic milieu and reported "he had such a spirit of youth and creativity a rare and wise and unusual man ".He was described as "the man who knew everyone " and indeed, in the course of an exuberant artistic career, Margules reveled in his durable friendships with Jane Heap and Margaret Anderson who showed his work at the offices of The Little Review as early as 1922 , with E Weyhe who also showed his works in the 1920’s, with Bernice Abbott and Walter Lowenfels whom he met in Paris in 1926 and with the likes of Alfrd Stieglitz, Stuart Davies, Buckminster Fuller and Jan Matulka all of whom he knew before 1930.

Born in Jassy, Rumaniain 1899, he was brought to America while still an infant. By age eleven he had won an award in the Wanamaker Children’s Art Contest. He studied briefly with Edwin Randby in Pittsburgh (1917 1918) before returning to New York where, with further encouragement from Myron Lechay, he embarked on a career that would lead to more than thirty one-person shows, constant exposure at the Whitney Annuals (1938 1956), and the acquisition of his work by nearly twenty museums including the Birobidjian Collection in Russia, Tel Aviv Museum, Whitney Museum of American Art, Museum of Modern Art, Walker Art Center, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.

By 1943 he had won a Brooklyn Museum Purchase Prize, and his work was consistently the focus of attention in the New York art press. Elaine de Kooning wrote a lengthy consideration of his working methods for the December 1951 edition of "ARTnews".

Alfred Stieglitz and Margules met in 1929 and quickly became friends. They carried on a twelve-year correspondence and Margules asserted, "Stieglitz was to me what Socrates was to his friends." Stieglitz introduced Marin and Margules in 1929 and thereafter a lasting friendship ensued. It was in John Marin that Margules found his artistic mentor and academy. "Marin was the only person Margules ever knew who could answer his questions about color, space, form, line movement; and it was from Marin he learned that what seems to come out of mysticism and wonder is rooted in knowledge and study and technique."

Marin himself recognized in Margules "an art lover with abounding faith and sincerity, with much intelligence and quick seeing ".

John Driscoll
Michael St. Clair
Babcock Galleries, 724 Fifth Avenue, New York . June 1994

Born in Falmouth, Massachusetts, Aldro Hibbard was an Impressionist landscape painter much concerned with light and shadow.  He was one of the founders of the Rockport Art Colony, and the Rockport Art Association now occupies his former studio.  Hibbard grew up in Dorchester and Boston and spent much time in the summers in Boston and Cape Cod.  He showed early artistic talent, an interest he shared with a life-long love of baseball, which led to his becoming a professional baseball player.

For his art training, he graduated from the Massachusetts Normal School and studied at the Boston Museum School with Edmund Tarbell, Joseph DeCamp, and Frank Benson. In Boston from 1927 to 1929, he occupied Fenway Studios.

Hibbard won the Paige Traveling Scholarship to study abroad, though his travels were cut short by War Word I , and he returned to America in 1914.  In the early 1920s, he became a summer resident of Cape Ann and wintered in Jamaica, Vermont in the West River Valley.  There he painted many rural snowscenes including oxen pulling wagons, covered bridges, and sugar houses .  Much of his large body of work, concerned with light and shadow, depicts Vermont landscape, New England coastlines, and the Canadian Rockies. From 1915, he was also an instructor in the Art Department of Boston University.

Source:
Michael David Zellman, 300 Years of American Art
Peter Falk, Who Was Who in American Art

From the Archives of AskArt

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }


/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

Exhibitions:

Allied Artists of America

American Artists Professional League

Art Institute of Chicago

Corcoran Gallery, Washington DC

Grand Central Art Galleries

Hudson Valley Art Association

National Academy of Design

North Shore Art Association

Paint and Clay Club

Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts

Rockport Art Association

Salmagundi Club

Vose Galleries

 

Associations:

Allied Artists of America

American Artists Professional League

Audubon Society Artists

Copley Society

Hudson Valley Art Association

National Academy of Design

North Shore Art Association

Paint and Clay Club

Rockport Art Association

Salmagundi Club

The Rockport Art Association

Museums:

Addison Gallery of American Art

Crocker Art Museum

Farnsworth Art Museum

Georgia Museum of Art

Oklahoma City Museum of Art

Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts

Rockport Art Association

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Whistler House Museum of Art